| |
|
Measuring Performance
|
| |
The
voice analysis options available on the Kay Visi-Pitch
and the IBM Speechviewer provide valuable information
that the student can use to monitor progress.
|
|

The student can receive specific feedback about pitch
level using Speechviewer or Visi-Pitch |
|
 The
statistics can help student evaluate pitch and loudness.
|
|
|
Instruction to Alter Pitch Level
|
|
Instruction
for lowering a student's pitch level and regulating
the pitch range can be supported by the use of the
voice meter on the Speech Viewer III The meter and
the available statistics provide valuable information
on pitch level and pitch range. |
|
Examples |
|

The instructor with the student can select the voice
meter on the SpeechViewer III and then set up a pitch
range to monitor pitch control during therapy. |
|

A screen shot of statistics is available for showing
and explaining the student's pitch range during therapy.
This is an effective way to discuss changes that have
been achieved. |
|
It
is important to develop metacognitive awareness and
control. Students can do this by consciously altering
pitch and practicing their best pitch in conversational
speech. |
|
 Here
the student consciously alters pitch. |
|
 The
student selects and practices a particular level. |
|
 Student
tries to monitor level in conversation. |
|
 In
addition to setting a target line (using the CSL Real-Time
Pitch) for the preferred average pitch level, it is
helpful to ask the student to judge the productions
they have just spoken and seen. Here the student sees
that her pitch is well above the 250Hz target line
and indicates that she feels she has not practiced
enough recently to achieve the lower, more appropriate
pitch on the functional words she has brought to class. |
|
 With
the visual feedback students often make several attempts
until they are satisfied with their productions. Here
we see production of doll, call, hard with self-corrections
based on a line showing real-time pitch compared to
a target pitch line. |
|
 Even
while practicing control and self-monitoring pitch,
it is important to encourage students to maintain
the best articulation possible. Here the student is
reminded that /sh/ and /t/ are voiceless and /m/ is
nasal. |
|
 Sometimes
it is necessary to go back and forth from one program
to another when using instrumentation. Here the student
was primarily working on pitch. The instructor switched
to the Real-Time Spectrogram to demonstrate some of
the articulatory features of the word “hot.” When
the student asked about her pitch, the instructor
switched back to the original program, the CSL Real-Time
Pitch. |
|
|
Instruction to Improve Prosody
|
|
Visual
displays can help students learn to modify prosodic
variables such as pitch, loudness, duration, and rate
to better convey their communicative intent. |
|
 Visual
feedback helps student control pitch and loudness. |
|
 Visual
feedback helps student develop ability to control
pitch and pitch variation. |
|

A student can use an instructor’s model, his imitation,
and statistical information to facilitate alterations
in intonation. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|